- Join Our Judge Voter Guide Alert
For more than 20 years, Mr. Huey has extensively researched judicial races with an emphasis on California elections.
Mr. Huey is an author, public speaker, entrepreneur and
owner of twosuccessful businesses. He hasgiven election recommendations on radio and TV nationwide.
Mr. Huey researches each candidate’s background and positions and talks with most judicial candidates.
California Judicial Candidates Voter Guide
Your recommendations guide for the California Supreme Court,
California Court of Appeals, California Supreme Courts.
Warning: Do NOT Vote for a Judicial Activist
How important is it for you
to vote for the right judges?
Judges sitting on California courts may be incompetent, corrupt or lazy.
Even worse, many are political opportunists with a political agenda. They are “judicial activists.” A judicial activist legislates from the bench. Instead of strictly interpreting California law, these judges make the laws. Instead of applying the law to facts, they impose their own values on us all.
It is the voters of California and the legislatures that are supposed to make laws. Not judges. In fact, these judges ignore the law in favor of their own liberal, left-wing, anti-family agendas.
Legislating from the bench, these judges destroy or weaken constitutional protection, votes by the people, family values, marriage, religious liberty and economic freedom.
Judicial activists have:
- Overturned voter-passed initiatives and laws passed by the state legislature, simply because they personally have a different belief system. They twist the law to rationalize their decisions.
- Imposed their own moral codes, political beliefs and secular values in an effort to reshape our society and promote social engineering.
The proper role of a judge is to fairly interpret the law to the facts of a particular case in order to arrive at a fair judgment. But that is not happening today in many courts.
Instead, activist judges have been advancing a political agenda that:
- Destroys the separation of powers
- Weakens the structure of federalism
- Usurps the right of the people to govern themselves
- Undermines protection of religious freedoms and the First Amendment
- Seeks to impose humanism, multiculturalism, relativism and internationalism on us, regardless of the people’s will
- Is biased against free enterprise and is anti-growth—resulting in higher taxes and less opportunity for our future
Pure and simple, it’s politics from the bench.
We research the candidates very carefully. We talk to many on the phone. We have evaluated their rulings, who appointed them, their endorsements and other criteria. Our recommendations are posted here for every judicial election.
Judicial Index Average
|Judicial Activist||Strict Constructionist|
- American Bar
On the California Supreme Court and the state Courts of Appeal, you vote “yes” or “no.” If a majority says “no,” they are out of the office and the Governor must select a new judge.
Most Superior Court races are two candidates running against each other and the one with the most votes win.
What people are saying about our recommendations:
“Dear Mr. Huey,
“I just wanted to thank you for enlightening me and helping me navigate through a section of the ballot I’ve always left blank.
“I hope more and more voters will take advantage of your wonderful research in the future, and realize the importance of choosing competent judges. In gratitude.”