- Join Our Judge Voter Guide AlertSign up for important alerts, recommendations, and results about the judges.
- Click here to
contact Mr. Huey (craig null@null judgevoterguide NULL.com)
Craig Huey is the coordinator and researcher for JudgeVoterGuide.com.
For more than 20 years, Mr. Huey has extensively researched judicial races with an emphasis on California elections.
Mr. Huey is an author, public speaker, entrepreneur and
owner of two successful businesses.He has given election recommendations on radio andTV nationwide .Mr. Huey researches each candidate’s background and positions and talks with most judicial candidates.
Click here to
contact Mr. Huey (craig null@null judgevoterguide NULL.com)
Your election recommendations and results guide for the California Superior Court,
California Judicial Candidates Voter Guide
Print This Post
Your recommendations guide for the California Supreme Court,
California Court of Appeals, California Superior Courts.
Warning: Do NOT Vote for a Judicial Activist
How important is it for you
to vote for the right judges?
Judges sitting on California courts may be incompetent, corrupt or lazy.
Even worse, many are political opportunists with a political agenda. They are “judicial activists.” A judicial activist legislates from the bench. Instead of strictly interpreting California law, these judges make the laws. Instead of applying the law to facts, they impose their own values on us all.
It is the voters of California and the legislatures that are supposed to make laws. Not judges. In fact, these judges ignore the law in favor of their own liberal, left-wing, anti-family agendas.
Legislating from the bench, these judges destroy or weaken constitutional protection, votes by the people, family values, marriage, religious liberty and economic freedom.
Judicial activists have:
- Overturned voter-passed initiatives and laws passed by the state legislature, simply because they personally have a different belief system. They twist the law to rationalize their decisions.
- Imposed their own moral codes, political beliefs and secular values in an effort to reshape our society and promote social engineering.
The proper role of a judge is to fairly interpret the law to the facts of a particular case in order to arrive at a fair judgment. But that is not happening today in many courts.
Instead, activist judges have been advancing a political agenda that:
- Destroys the separation of powers
- Weakens the structure of federalism
- Usurps the right of the people to govern themselves
- Undermines protection of religious freedoms and the First Amendment
- Seeks to impose humanism, multiculturalism, relativism and internationalism on us, regardless of the people’s will
- Is biased against free enterprise and is anti-growth—resulting in higher taxes and less opportunity for our future
Pure and simple, it’s politics from the bench.
We have researched the candidates very carefully. We have talked to many on the phone, and tried to speak with all of them. We have evaluated their rulings, who appointed them, their endorsements and other criteria. Our recommendations are posted here for every judicial election.
Ratings:
Judicial Index Average
|
|
| Judicial Activist | Strict Constructionist |
- Positions
- Contributions
- Rulings
- Statements
Qualifications
|
|
| Unqualified | Very Qualified |
- Experience
- Reputation
- Integrity
- American Bar
Association ratings
On the California Supreme Court and the state Courts of Appeal, you vote “yes” or “no.” If a majority says “no,” they are out of the office and the Governor must select a new judge.
Most Superior Court races are two candidates running against each other and the one with the most votes win.
Los Angeles County Election, November 2012
Print This Post
Election results:
= Our candidate or issue won
= Our candidate or issue lost
San Diego County
Judicial
Superior Court Judge; County of San Diego; Office 25
- Jim Miller Judicial Index 8

- Robert Amador Judicial Index 6

What people are saying about our recommendations:
Wonderful research
“Dear Mr. Huey,
“I just wanted to thank you for enlightening me and helping me navigate through a section of the ballot I’ve always left blank.
“I hope more and more voters will take advantage of your wonderful research in the future, and realize the importance of choosing competent judges. In gratitude.”
—Michael



